How Shah Faesal will return to IAS job after resignation, What is procedure?

After an attempt in politics, Indian Administrative Services (IAS) officer Shah Faesal, who resigned in protest of the “relentless” killings in Kashmir in 2019, has been reinstated.

Shah Faesal wrote on Twitter on Wednesday that he is confident that life will give him another chance.

IAS job Shah Faesal

He wrote that “Eight months of my life (Jan 2019-Aug 2019) created so much baggage that I was almost finished. While chasing a chimera, I lost almost everything that I had built over the years. Job. Friends. Reputation. Public goodwill. But I never lost hope. My idealism had let me down”.

But I had not lost hope. My idealism disappointed me. But I had faith in myself that I would rectify my mistakes. And life will definitely give me a chance.”

He also wrote that he will turn 39 next month and he is excited to start all over again.

Faesal added: “But I had faith in myself. That I would undo the mistakes I had made. That life would give me another chance. A part of me is exhausted with the memory of those 8 months and wants to erase that legacy. Much of it is already gone. Time will mop off the rest In believe. (SIC)”

“Just thought of sharing that life is beautiful. It is always worth giving ourselves another chance. Setbacks make us stronger. And there is an amazing world beyond the shadows of the past. I turn 39 next month. And I’m really excited to start all over again,” he tweeted.

How to return to job after resignation?

The rules relating to resignation and withdrawal have been registered under the All India Services (Death-cum-retirement Benefit) Rules 1958.

The Central Government, through a notice dated July 28, 2011, amended the rules that allow IAS staff to return to the government even after he or she resigns, but with some riders.

The statement said: “An officer may withdraw his resignation if his resignation was made” for valid reasons which do not imply any reflection of his integrity, efficiency or conduct.”

Rule 5 (1A) (i) of the amended DCRB Guidelines states that central authorities may allow an officer to withdraw his resignation “in the public interest”.

Also Read:  Delimitation done; What next for Jammu and Kashmir? Explained

An amendment to the 2011 Instruction states that “the interval of no liability between the date on which the dismissal became effective and the date on which the member was allowed to renew responsibility through permission to withdraw resignation is simply no more than ninety days.” (IAS job Shah faesal)

An identical change in the Instructions stated: “A request for revocation of resignation shall not be accepted by the central authorities if a member of the Service resigns or publishes in order to be associated with any political event or any organization occupying half of the politics, or to participate, or subscribe to support or assist in any other method, any political action or political exercise, or agitation, or in any other case interfere with or use your affect to or participate in elections to any legislature, or local authorities “.

It is not in the government’s interest to keep government officials unwilling to do so. Thus, the general rule is that the dismissal of a civil servant should be accepted, except in the following circumstances:

If the relevant civil servant is engaged in important work and it takes time to take alternative measures to replace him/her, the resignation should not be accepted immediately, but only after alternative measures have been taken to replace him/her.

If a suspended civil servant applies for resignation, the competent authority must consider, in the light of the disciplinary proceedings against the civil servant, whether it is in the public interest to accept the dismissal. Usually, since civil servants are removed only in cases of serious crimes, it would be incorrect to agree to the resignation of a civil servant during the removal.

Exceptions to this rule are cases where the alleged crimes are not related to moral wrongdoing or when the amount of evidence against the accused government official is not strong enough to justify the assumption that if the agency continues, he will be removed or dismissed. , or when the department is likely to be so protracted that it will be cheaper for the state treasury to accept the resignation.

You can connect with Ground Report on FacebookTwitterInstagram, and Whatsapp and Subscribe to our YouTube channel. For suggestions and writeups mail us at GReport2018@gmail.com 

ALSO READ